<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Lists</title>
	<link>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/</link>
	<description>The world according to a hula hooping, TKD black-belt wearing, radio show producing physiologist with aspirations to science journalism</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevbo</title>
		<link>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3806</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3806</guid>
		<description>Strange! How could I have seemingly been the only one to nominate you over at V. Blue's? (Unless there were others via e-mail, of course) You were robbed! Can any of the others hula-hoop? I doubt it.

I don't know how you're going to find the courage to get up each morning after this crushing omission!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange! How could I have seemingly been the only one to nominate you over at V. Blue&#8217;s? (Unless there were others via e-mail, of course) You were robbed! Can any of the others hula-hoop? I doubt it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how you&#8217;re going to find the courage to get up each morning after this crushing omission!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paco</title>
		<link>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3780</link>
		<dc:creator>paco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3780</guid>
		<description>By blogging on this you're actually admitting that you care. Guess what, those lists are the dummiest thing I've seen. As if playing videogames makes anyone a geek... ridiculous.
Screw that, enjoy science, being smart is one of the most efficient ways of looking effectively sexy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By blogging on this you&#8217;re actually admitting that you care. Guess what, those lists are the dummiest thing I&#8217;ve seen. As if playing videogames makes anyone a geek&#8230; ridiculous.<br />
Screw that, enjoy science, being smart is one of the most efficient ways of looking effectively sexy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3707</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3707</guid>
		<description>Eleven is better than ten. It's one louder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eleven is better than ten. It&#8217;s one louder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Glitterbear</title>
		<link>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3703</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Glitterbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3703</guid>
		<description>I would totally put you near the top of the list. You were the hottest science geek in both of our UCD Physiology cohorts. Kisses.

Pssst...It's Troy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would totally put you near the top of the list. You were the hottest science geek in both of our UCD Physiology cohorts. Kisses.</p>
<p>Pssst&#8230;It&#8217;s Troy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3700</link>
		<dc:creator>M.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3700</guid>
		<description>I took a look at the Violet Blue link during my lunch break at work. Please add NSFW. I have no problem with nude pictures. However, the government agency I work for may have a different view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a look at the Violet Blue link during my lunch break at work. Please add NSFW. I have no problem with nude pictures. However, the government agency I work for may have a different view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3699</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kirstensanford.com/2009/01/12/on-the-lists/#comment-3699</guid>
		<description>While I am sure that you don't want to bite the media hand that feeds you, do you not think the Wired article helps perpetuate the rather unevolved attitude to women that exists in the tech world? This post http://suw.org.uk/2009/01/06/join-me-on-ada-lovelace-day/ and the links in it make the point more forcefully than I can, (and perhaps more forcefully than I would wish to). 

I don't find Violet Blue's piece objectionable, partly because it from a woman, though why that should make a difference I am not sure, perhaps it's on the same principle that only black people can use the word "nigger". Mainly though it's because she is challenging rather than reinforcing sexual stereotypes, and the tone of the piece is more knowing and ironic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am sure that you don&#8217;t want to bite the media hand that feeds you, do you not think the Wired article helps perpetuate the rather unevolved attitude to women that exists in the tech world? This post <a href="http://suw.org.uk/2009/01/06/join-me-on-ada-lovelace-day/" rel="nofollow">http://suw.org.uk/2009/01/06/join-me-on-ada-lovelace-day/</a> and the links in it make the point more forcefully than I can, (and perhaps more forcefully than I would wish to). </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t find Violet Blue&#8217;s piece objectionable, partly because it from a woman, though why that should make a difference I am not sure, perhaps it&#8217;s on the same principle that only black people can use the word &#8220;nigger&#8221;. Mainly though it&#8217;s because she is challenging rather than reinforcing sexual stereotypes, and the tone of the piece is more knowing and ironic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
